January 28, 2015: Update – This post originally described the work of two papers that were published within two weeks of one another. The paper by Degen, et al which was published in Science has been retracted. The authors found that it was impossible in two cases out of three to tell the difference between a hydrogen atom and a carbon atom. This is because both carbon and hydrogen have similar magnetic interactions with NVs. The paper by Lukin and Park is still accurate, because the electron reporters are close enough to tell the difference. This post has been modified to remove the results from the paper published in Science. You can read the original post that describes the work from both papers here.
November 6, 2014
A hydrogen atom is about ten billion times smaller than your head and about 400,000 times smaller than the thinnest hair on it. The most powerful microscopes do not even come close to seeing one. Other imaging techniques like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) do sense hydrogens, but only in groups of a million at the very least. It’s nearly impossible to pick one hydrogen out from a crowd.
Nearly. In recent weeksThe research groups of Professors Hongkun Park and Mikhail Lukin at Harvard University have reported that they can detect a single hydrogen atom sitting on the surface of a diamond.
In a report published online November 3 in Physical Review Letters, they narrow the hydrogen atom’s location down to a couple of angstroms—about the size of a single molecular bond.
The technique relies on the presence of small defects in the diamond called nitrogen vacancies, or NVs, where two carbon atoms are swapped out for one nitrogen. The NVs sit just below the diamond’s surface and act as hydrogen detectors. When the scientists shine a laser on an NV, it will start sending out pulsing flashes of light in response. The pulsing will change based on the NV’s magnetic interactions with atoms and other particles nearby.
“We can actually take each NV center and measure its individual depth below the diamond surface,” explains Alex Sushkov of Harvard, lead author on the study in PRL. Once they find an NV, they can then extract the distance between the NV center and any particles on the surface from how long the pulsing continues and the frequency of the light flashes.
The scientists looked at the interactions between the NV and a solitary electron reporter sitting on the surface of the diamond close to a hydrogen atom. “There is a limit on how close these NV centers can get [to the hydrogen],” says Sushkov. “But these reporters are right there, a few angstroms [away].”
A hydrogen can barely manage a light magnetic tap, which makes it hard for the NV center to detect it if it is too far away. On the other hand, a free electron like the reporter packs a mighty magnetic punch that is easily felt by a far off NV center. One soft touch from a nearby hydrogen, and the electron reporter will pummel the NV to let it know the hydrogen is there. From the NV’s flashing response, the scientists can locate both the electron reporter and the hydrogen.
Scientists might one day expand this method so that they can locate the hydrogens on an individual molecule on the diamond’s surface. This would allow them to paint a picture of that molecule in the same way MRI is used to paint a picture of your brain. “We are actually working right now on imaging simple molecules,” says Sushkov. “At some point in the future, we envision this technique as being useful for magnetic imaging of biomolecules such as proteins, whose structure cannot be figured out using other methods.”
A. O. Sushkov, I. Lovchinsky, N. Chisholm, R. L. Walsworth, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin; “Magnetic Resonance Detection of Individual Proton Spins Using Quantum Reporters.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 197601; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.197601